Several
things came to mind including the ongoing profiling of African-American males and
the continuing devaluation of their lives by American society but what stood
out immediately was the militarization of the local police, armed with riot
gear including body armor and camouflage, tear gas, assault rifles and tanks like
they were defending the Alamo. It resembled a scene right out of the civil
rights era, the only thing missing were the vicious attack dogs and the water
hoses to wash them down. So instead of reaching out to calm the community
peacefully, the local police opted to fan the flames and go the intimidation
route, which only fueled the anger and cynicism of the demonstrators who ironically
were there protesting their distrust of the police. Again, what the media
described as a riot was essentially on the first night of the protests when a
bunch of idiots used the event as an excuse to ransack and burn their own community…dumb
asses. Much more disturbing
and what should have been the focus of the reporting was that peaceful
protesters and those attempting to report on events were being harassed and arrested.
I gotta say
the disparity in the reaction of law enforcement to African-American protesters
vs. Whites is amazing. Case in point, the Cliven Bundy stand-off. These protesters
showed up at the Bundy ranch in Nevada to “air
out their discontent”, demanding that cows be allowed to graze on the tax payers’
dime. Armed with sniper rifles aimed at police they were not threatened with
tear gas and faced no one sporting camouflage and there were no tanks. Instead
law enforcement backed down and the Bundy cows continued to graze. So
protesters gather with assault rifles, point them at police to protest the
seizure of cattle from a rancher grazing them on federal land free of charge
for years and they are deemed “patriots”. Unarmed protesters gather to protest the
street execution of a teenager and are met with tear gas, rubber bullets,
nightsticks, and arrests and they are "thugs."
Just imagine what would have happened had the Ferguson protestors showed up
armed exercising right to carry laws.
After
delaying and stalling for almost a week and refusing to release the name of the
officer involved, today the police chief in Ferguson released the name of the
officer along with video which appears to implicate Michael Brown as a suspect
in the robbery of a box of cigars at a convenience store minutes before he was
shot but it doesn’t justify his killing and does not necessarily vindicate the
officer involved. There remain unanswered questions involving his death. Was
the officer who stopped Michael Brown even aware that he was a suspect in a
robbery? Why did it take so long to interview the eyewitness who was
accompanying Michael Brown and why hasn’t he been arrested as a suspect in the
robbery? Is there evidence of excessive force by the officer and why hasn’t his
account of the shooting been released? An autopsy was performed and released to
the police, so was he shot in the back as witnesses indicated and how many
times was he shot?
Finally, I
realize that not all law enforcement officers are corrupt but I have absolutely
no respect for those who are deputized to serve and protect and then become bullies
based on assumptions of color. I don’t claim to know what happened when Michael
Brown was killed I wasn’t there. I don’t know if the eyewitnesses or the police
are telling the truth but I can relate to the frustration felt by the community
of protestors and I understand their distrust and disgust. I also know that adversarial aggressive
tactics such as those exhibited against the protestors and reporters in
Ferguson as well as the lack of constructive interaction with the community do
nothing towards promoting goodwill As
long as these methods are allowed, condoned and encouraged the distrust and
skepticism of police in the African-American community will unfortunately continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment